Search results for query: *

Disagree with all due respect. I love third version games and I take them over DLC any time. It would be annoying to buys bits of the game every month or so when you can get the whole game as one in my opinion.

What are you talking about? DLC and third version are far different. It is not hard to tell the difference. DLC is unlikable and unwanted for pokemon games in my opinion.

Actually no you don't. Third versions have more extra content than DLC provides. Therefore neither is the same. Again, we have to agree to disagree.

Actually there is. A third version is a game you buy at the shops with full content. DLC is just small amounts of content you download for games. I take a full third version game over DLC any day in my opinion. Agree to disagree.

Third versions are different. They focus on a different mascot and have some differences to pokemon and so on. DLC is just unnecessary in my opinion.

Well, I really don't want pay more. Getting the games costs players a bit so certain content shouldn't be exclusive to DLC but this is my opinion.

DLC is always a bad idea for main series pokemon games. The games should whole and complete. Not have bits cut out and only available to get by downloading. Event pokemon is one thing but for things main story or post game? No thank you.

DLC should not happen in main series pokemon games ever in my opinion. Spin-off games can have it.