- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 8,093
- Reaction score
- 8,390
I don't think that the games will be a reboot. GF will never take actual Pokemon out of the game.Or maybe it's because the games are supposed to be a reboot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that the games will be a reboot. GF will never take actual Pokemon out of the game.Or maybe it's because the games are supposed to be a reboot.
I don't think that the games will be a reboot. GF will never take actual Pokemon out of the game.
I don't think that a BW style reboot will happen either, because I don't think that GF will ever add a large amount of Pokemon again. Also, adding non Gen 1 Pokemon to Kanto would eliminate a lot of potential buyers.It doesn't have to be a hard reboot, BW were soft reboot by neglecting previous gens until the post game. They still could reboot Kanto with a new storyline without taking out pokemon, instead adding Gen2+ pokemon to the region as a "Kanto that has evolved". A reboot can have different shapes, it's all a matter of what can be done and what shouldn't.
A hard reboot won't be too bad either.I don't think that a BW style reboot will happen either, because I don't think that GF will ever add a large amount of Pokemon again. Also, adding non Gen 1 Pokemon to Kanto would eliminate a lot of potential buyers.
It would alienate the 28-32 crowd for having too much change to their childhood region.A hard reboot won't be too bad either.
Regardless there's a good chance that new Pokemon in an innovated Kanto would do the opposite.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/Jackson556D/status/981211577281122309/photo/1
what do you guys think?
Not necessarily. They aren't the only crowd. That's why Kanto still keeps Kanto while being a little innovated. Both crowds are satisfied.It would alienate the 28-32 crowd for having too much change to their childhood region.
The 28-32 crowd would be the most interested in a return to Kanto. That's why it must appeal to them.Not necessarily. They aren't the only crowd. That's why Kanto still keeps Kanto while being a little innovated. Both crowds are satisfied.
It would alienate the 28-32 crowd for having too much change to their childhood region.
And the opposite would also be true if Game Freak merely stick with the original 151 Pokémon.I don't think that a BW style reboot will happen either, because I don't think that GF will ever add a large amount of Pokemon again. Also, adding non Gen 1 Pokemon to Kanto would eliminate a lot of potential buyers.
Considering that crowd would just leave again as soon as Game Freak does something else with the Pokemon games, as well as the fact that this will be the first game on a home console, you'd alienate most of the current fanbase and possibly lose them from wasting the first Switch title on a Kanto remake. Too many people would dismiss it as a glorified tech demo, and this would lose a lot more sales if that's all Game Freak does with their first console titles.The 28-32 crowd would be the most interested in a return to Kanto. That's why it must appeal to them.
I understand that, but why can't it be innovated and appeal to both. Adding new Pokemon to an old region for example. If you don't want to use the new ones then just stick to Kanto.The 28-32 crowd would be the most interested in a return to Kanto. That's why it must appeal to them.
View attachment 109190
I have to mention that while I know a little Japanese and also some stuff about logo design and clarity, there could absolutely be things that I am missing, misinterpreting, or simply don't know- I'm no authority on Japanese logo design, by any means. These are just the things that I felt seemed odd about these logos, and cause me to doubt their legitimacy.