Master Simm
The Real McCoy
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2013
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: Space Race Mafia - Night 0 - Role Confirmations (Subs still welcome)
Confirming.
Confirming.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This vote... it's missing something.Vote: twinArmageddons
tA's comment seems a little fishy. I mean, how could he know if a group had all confirmed unless he knew the others in it?
Vote: twinArmageddons
About the same unless something comes through. Completely uncalled for. If he wasn't so new I would think it was a major scum trip up.@Soulmaster Do you expect to be more or less active than usual in this game? Also, what do you think of Aerial Ace's vote for twinArmageddons?
@Dark Blueberry On a scale of 1-10, 1 being Obv-Town and 10 being Obv-Scum, how scummy do you plan on being in this game?
Because your analysis of Day 1 voting is completely wrong.Normally on Day 1 there are joke votes which hold nothing over the game really. But @Master Mew; Why did you follow the vote?
Because your analysis of Day 1 voting is completely wrong.Normally on Day 1 there are joke votes which hold nothing over the game really. But @Master Mew; Why did you follow the vote?
Early bandwagons are important, if we all vote for different people then we won't learn anything from RVS. The point is to build a bandwagon on someone, almost lynch them (that "almost" is important) then demand that they assert their Towniness by scumhunting. That's how substantive discussion begins.
Otherwise, we have a meaningless Day 1, a basically random nightkill, and then start Day 2 with no reads (a.k.a. 90% of Bulba games). In a game this size, we only have two mislynches before LYLO, so I don't think we can risk a meaningless Day 1.
Oh, also, you didn't just, "tie it up," you just took twinArmageddons to three votes.
Bulba's RVS is designed to fail
@Soulmaster Why do you want the votes tied? We have to lynch correctly 50% of the time to win this game, but if we don't get a lynch today that jumps to 66%. Granted, if we screw up and lynch a Townie today, we'll still have to lynch correctly 66% of the time from that point on to win, but we'll have one fewer suspect. So there really is no scenario in which a No Lynch today would be better than lynching.
This is exactly why I said:
Bulba's RVS is designed to fail
We have decided that we need to do everything within our power to prevent a lynch on Day One, so at the end of the day we end up with 9 votes on 7 people, no lynch, then a nightkill, and then we start Day Two almost exactly like Day One: With no information.
Basically, that sets us on a path to expending both of our available mislynches on near-random targets. Why set ourselves back like that?
Why not turn up the heat on one player Day One, press them for something substantive, and start a meaningful discussion now? By that route, we'll have far more reads on Day Two.
Your vote is very safe - you justified it purely by the fact that it tied the votes, with no thought for whether or not your target was Scum, and expect it to be interpreted as a towntell because the site meta preaches that trying to prevent lynches is Pro-Town. But it isn't.
FoS: Soulmaster
We start with 9 players, two of which are scum. Thus, we can mislynch twice before we enter LYLO (lynch-or-lose). Thus, we must lynch correctly 50% of the time to win.
Alternatively, if we were to no lynch today, we would only have one mislynch before entering MYLO (mislynch-or-lose). Thus, we would have to lynch correctly 66% of the time to win. This is nearly insurmountable for Bulba Towns in my experience.
Conclusion: No Lynching is not really an option today, and won't be at any point in the game barring a successful Doctor protection.
@Phoenicks Why did you move your vote from twinArmageddons to pressure-vote Aerial Ace, when the twinArmageddons wagon had not yet accomplished the purpose of the early RVS wagon? i.e. Why start pressuring Aerial Ace with your vote, when we weren't finished pressuring twinArmageddons?
@Master Mew; Honestly, I'm trying to come up for a reason for your and Phoenicks' original votes, as well as a reason to "jump on the bandwagon" with you.
I've only ever played mafia with cards before...
P.S. What's pressure voting?
. Completely uncalled for. If he wasn't so new I would think it was a major scum trip up.
And Vote: twinarmageddons to tie it up.
Normally on Day 1 there are joke votes which hold nothing over the game really.
But jokes aside, I assume there are only a few power roles in this game?
The rules we are all expected to read said:There are 9 players in this game, 7 of which are town (Soviet Space Program) and 2 of which are mafia (NASA). The town will have one doctor and 6 vanilla townies. The mafia will have one role cop and one mafia goon.
*facepalm* thanks for catching that.
Unvote: twinArmageddons
Vote: TM40 Aerial Ace
but doubly, if you want a lynch so bad why don't you unvote twins that way Aerial Ace is lynched?
While you make some sense it isn't enough to warrant an unvote from me quite yet. The two of you could be scum buddies so you wouldn't want him to be lynched.
I disagree - one can be obv-scum without actually being scum. In fact, I've found obv-scum to be innocent as often as they are guilty - scum are rarely truly obvious.@Master Mew; Your question is based off the assumption that Phoenicks is mafia. In order for him to become obv-scum, he needs to be scum first.
So if Phoenicks is scum you figure we'll have him sniffed out by Day 4?That said, if Phoenicks is scum, I expect him to become obv-scum in probably seven or so phases. He can hide for a while, but if he's that obvious, then we'll find him.
Not the question that I asked.And yes, I'll vote for him if he's mafia. What sort of question is that?
Just wanted to know if you had any gutreads on Phoenicks by the time you would get around to responding - I did not expect a prompt response, so I figured Nick would have gotten a post in before you answered. If you'd waited another half-hour, I would have been right. ;-)I don't really see how your specific questions to me help the town move forward at all.
Why do you, "want to be able to go against this somehow?" If the math is sound (and it is), what prompts this resistence?...I want to be able to go against this somehow but math doesn't lie. And your math looks sound from my point of view.