Phosphene
Formerly SpinyShell
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2019
- Messages
- 4,603
- Reaction score
- 7,005
I don't see how that's relevant at all.
They might’ve replied to the wrong thread on accident.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see how that's relevant at all.
The point of my post - was an attempt to disprove a speculation that we will see starter evo's tomorrow. Still too early.I don't see how that's relevant at all.
That reasoning assumes that a Pokémon of every type needs to be revealed before revealing starter evolutions, which doesn’t make much sense.The point of my post - was an attempt to disprove a speculation that we will see starter evo's tomorrow. Still too early.
And I listed a reasoning.
But this is consistent with the last 2 gens where the middle and final evo's were revealed the 1st and last month.That reasoning assumes that a Pokémon of every type needs to be revealed before revealing starter evolutions, which doesn’t make much sense.
You are literally contradicting yourself.But this is consistent with the last 2 gens where the middle and final evo's were revealed the 1st and last month.
We only got 11/18 elements revealed.
But this is consistent with the last 2 gens where the middle and final evo's were revealed the 1st and last month.
We only got 11/18 elements revealed.
I agree, seems a bit of a stretch just to not get hopes upBesides, linking the starter evolution reveal to revealing a Pokemon from every type makes no logical or marketing sense.
Yup!Also didn’t Oriden debunk this by discovering that the date was photoshopped?
Nnnope, because it actually didn't predict Neutralizing Gas at all-
View attachment 124156
Turns out it was posted after Neutralizing Gas had already been revealed. Big surprise there.
What do you mean by linking?Besides, linking the starter evolution reveal to revealing a Pokemon from every type makes no logical or marketing sense.
How so?You are literally contradicting yourself.
OK.What do you mean by linking?
How so?
-
PkmnTrainerV and CrazyCreeperKid, what would make more sense?
Leaking out all the pokemon by element at a time (i.e., leak out all the Grass pokemon 1st, then all the Fire pokemon next), or leak out a family of pokemon, 1 element at a time?
But I never said that either. I said "almost."OK.
They don't need to reveal a pokemon of every type.
Even with almost, almost is implying at least 12 different types, which they really don't need. They really just need to reveal:But I never said that either. I said "almost."
Was this post in response to my "how am I contradicting myself?" or is this separate.Even with almost, almost is implying at least 12 different types, which they really don't need. They really just need to reveal:
Pokemon of the 4 starting types that aren't the starters
A rock or ground pokemon
Pseudo legend
A fairy type
Regional bird, bug, normal type, and pikachuclone.
Which they haven't done a lot yet, only almost fulfilling the first point with Drednaw, Gossifleur and Yamper, as well as the pikaclone.
It was separate.Was this post in response to my "how am I contradicting myself?" or is this separate.
Anyways, you list some examples that are arbitrary. I don't see how that makes my point contradicting.