- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 19,897
- Reaction score
- 13,960
The same could be said for people who still think that a third version or sequel is inevitable after Masuda said they would do something different.I'm just saying I don't believe it's happening, and anyone who seems to think it's inevitable is fooling themselves.
It's cost-effective to create a bit of extra content and focus on developing the next generation.it's really a question of how to make more money after development and time costs are taken into account, and still keep up the standards the company has for itself. I don't know GF's fiscal information, so I can't really make a guess as to whether it's more cost affective for them to go ahead with another game or make a DLC,
The Vita release was its selling point.Morningstar said:Okay EXTEND (which i assume was what you meant with the ports) was was also relased on the PS3 and X360 (and later Steam)
Not without Colosseum, which only a fraction of GBA players owned. Game Freak deliberately chose not to make all the Generation II Pokémon available between RS and FRLG.That reminds me, In Gen 3 would completing the National Dex be possible using the Original Ruby and Sapphire in-combination with FireRed and LeafGreen, Gen 4+ mons excluded for obvious reasons?
Last edited: