Mitchman
Simpler times ahead
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 10,936
- Reaction score
- 2,335
Hmm you are indeed correct. If Aether were to be the type that binds them, as to be honest I doubt we're going for another mon-type pair of legendaries and I doubt they would use psychic as the common type, I guess we could have Aether/Flying Yveltal with a (Steel/Grass)/Aether type Xerneas. And while it would be nice for GF to be original on the counterparts and their basis, it would make sense if Aether were ever to be a type that it would at least be based on something in Greek Mythology, in which the elements do have a tie with some mythological creatures.That's exactly the reason why Aether could fit Yveltal just as well as it could Xerneas. If anything, Yveltal has more to do with the pure upper air of the "heavens" than Xerneas does.The Pokemon are based off of Aether and Erebus, the Greek Primordial Deities of light and darkness. Ah you might say, but light time is the most used new type thing, and we're sick of it. But you see, Aether might be light, and the aether element might include light, but it is not light itself, but the stuff floating around Earth that includes light. The Pokemon could work as such, and it could be a very subtle curveball. Thoughts?
Groudon and Kyogre are the only (legendary) version mascots that don't share a type, and it is probably not a coincidence that they only have one type each. If a new type were introduced, I would think that it would be given to both Xerneas and Yveltal. I wouldn't be sure about Yveltal having Dark as one of its types, especially as Dark/Flying has been done twice before.
As for the legendaries' real-life origin, I am not really interested in that, if to be honest. I doubt that it will be a factor in their story, and I prefer it when Game Freak try to be original.