- Joined
- Feb 16, 2018
- Messages
- 5,119
- Reaction score
- 4,085
- Pronouns
- He/Him
- Thread starter
- #21
How so? Could you please explain?I don't see any reason Ash should be swapped that early on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so? Could you please explain?I don't see any reason Ash should be swapped that early on.
I didn't feel like there was any closer at the end of Kanto or OI for Ash. I think that it add to the fact that one of the reasons that i'm still watching the anime is because of Ash.How so? Could you please explain?
So I guess at this point I can say, Ash staying the protagonist is a good idea for both marketing and possible fan backlash they would prefer to avoid. I know how other fans felt about Tracey replacing Brock, even though I didn't mind the former all that much, I got how other fans felt, so I have to always remember to consider the feelings of other fans.
I used to think that keeping Ash for so long was a mistake. Bringing another protagonist in the show would have brought some fresh air and definitely gave opportunity the writers to be more creative. But something I read recently made me reconsider my opinion. Pokémon has the biggest income as a franchise in the history. It got me thinking, maybe, the writers were doing the right thing by keeping the mascot of the show and its trainer for good.