I would rather Game Freak not delete Unown just because it has a bunch of different models thank you very much. They're too important to the lore to be retconned out of existence, and doing so would just reinforce the negative opinion of being lazy that has been plaguing the company as of late. Just give the Unown a proper move set instead of only having the now-removed Hidden Power and we'll be all set.
Replaying BoT W now actually. I would love it if LA had the same wild feeling. The sounds in BoTW really does make it feel like you're camping in the wilderness.
Prior to the crown tundra dlc all legendary pokemons signature moves were given the same yellow triangle delete message. Once the dlc dropped their moves were added to the games along with them. It could be that gamefreak has decided hidden power should be an unown exclusive attack and will be readded solely for unown when its in a game.
Well, for Legends I could see them deciding that certain pokemon just happen to not be there, whether they're useful or not. As it is, Castform definitely shouldn't be.
I wouldn't worry about it. They're not going to delete any pokemon, just exclude them from some games and bring them back for others. I'm sure moves that were removed will also make a return eventually (unless it's the Pikachu and Eevee baby name moves from LGPE, those may just stay there). If they bring back Unown for Legends like they should, then they'd most likely bring back Hidden Power as well.
Yeah. I mean I remember it happening literally right after the first movie, too. But it's just gotten worse in recent years. It's like someone found the old playground rumors and slowly but steadily expanded upon them so it became all pokemon and not just Mewtwo.
This really makes me worry that the rest of TPCi are forcing Game Freak to keep the “three year generation” quota regardless of the outcome. And here I thought Legends: Arceus actually meant that they realized that the three-year schedule was unsustainable. Guess I was wrong.
This really makes me worry that the rest of TPCi are forcing Game Freak to keep the “three year generation” quota regardless of the outcome. And here I thought Legends: Arceus actually meant that they realized that the three-year schedule was unsustainable. Guess I was wrong.
what do you mean? isnt legends considered gen 8?This really makes me worry that the rest of TPCi are forcing Game Freak to keep the “three year generation” quota regardless of the outcome. And here I thought Legends: Arceus actually meant that they realized that the three-year schedule was unsustainable. Guess I was wrong.
It is. @Eitarou and I were talking about how the release date of Legends: Arceus probably means that we’re still stuck on the “three year generation life cycle in terms of release dates when we would have preferred Game Freak to take their time with the games given how this resulted in not only Dexit, but also a bare-bones minimum in terms of content with SwSh upon release (excluding the Expansion Pass DLC). @Esserise put it best.
I mean, we don't really know how long this was in development for. Considering they outsourced the remakes I feel like a lot of time and effort was put into this game, though we'll have to see.
