New Pokémon Discussion

[Sanic Hegehog]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Mijumaru is said to focus on Attack while Tsutarja is said to focus on the Special stats. Thats probably going to be implemented in the evolutions too.

 

[vessels]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Assuming the final evolutions are true like the secondary ones, it seems Pokabu's is not going to be all that fast. However, unlike Blaziken and Infernape, Pokabu's final stage will probably have higher defense/special defense and HP.

The way I see it, the Pokabu line might be projected as Swampert's fire/fighting counterpart. We've heard earlier that its best stats will be its HP and Attack...

 

[Falconwing]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

I'm probably just getting Smugleaf this time. I like his design, and I suppose I might as well run with a grass type again.

I wonder if Ononokusu is another pseudo legend, or more of a Flygon.

 

[Eitarou]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

It's a dragon with axes on its face

who cares if its psuedo or not?

 

[Sanic Hegehog]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Ononokusu is not Psudo-legendary material. Not dueled typed, two abilities, not near the end of the Dex (I think)...

 

[βƹβƹ ɱɪɢηѻη]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Ononokusu is not Psudo-legendary material. Not dueled typed, two abilities, not near the end of the Dex (I think)...

Garchomp wasn't near the end of the Dex, it was in the middle.

And we're towards near the end of the dex.

But I don't care about Pseudo-Legendary status. It's meaningless to me. It's a term that the fandom came up with.

 

[Gar]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

It's not meaningless. Pseudo status allows us to know if Ononokusu has a Base Stat total of 600 or not. If it's akin to Flygon, it'll only be 520 (which isn't bad, per se).

 

[βƹβƹ ɱɪɢηѻη]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

It's not meaningless. Pseudo status allows us to know if Ononokusu has a Base Stat total of 600 or not. If it's akin to Flygon, it'll only be 520 (which isn't bad, per se).

I said it's meaningless to me. I don't give a s*** about base stats.

 

[Eitarou]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

I said it's meaningless to me. I don't give a s*** about base stats.

and all I care is the fact that it's a dragon...with axes on its face

 

[βƹβƹ ɱɪɢηѻη]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

and all I care is the fact that it's a dragon...with axes on its face

Amen!

So, we only have 5 unknown Pokemon left.. Pretty sad we've been spoiled. XP

 

[Gar]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

I said it's meaningless to me. I don't give a s*** about base stats.

Sorry. I guess I should've read it better. =P

But Pika said "Who cares if it is pseudo or not?", so I guess I meant to reply to that with the same message.

 

[Falconwing]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Amen!

So, we only have 5 unknown Pokemon left.. Pretty sad we've been spoiled. XP

No, we have dozens. Even now, all those pokemon are rumors.

 

[Eitarou]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Sorry. I guess I should've read it better. =P

But Pika said "Who cares if it is pseudo or not?", so I guess I meant to reply to that with the same message.

my reasons are that it's an awesome looking pokemon

therefore I must use it (plus I know it won't be weak too)

 

[Gar]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

my reasons are that it's an awesome looking pokemon

therefore I must use it (plus I know it won't be weak too)

No, no, I know what you mean. I'm just saying, some people do care if it is pseudo, because that status determines stats.

Like you said, pseudo or not, it will be powerful.

 

[Ivysaur]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

No, we have dozens. Even now, all those pokemon are rumors.

You sure it isn't best just to combine this thread with the rumors one, Ryuu?

 

[Falconwing]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

You sure it isn't best just to combine this thread with the rumors one, Ryuu?

They aren't confirmed. I won't try to pretend they are.

 

[Kouprey]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Hi,

I have checked on serebii.net that ononokusu and kibago have the same abilities. However, I still think they are maybe not related. I actually think each of them belong to two rivals dragon clans, hence the rivalry ability.

 

[Falconwing]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

I'd go on a long rant about how they visibly resemble each other, are the same type, and have the same abilities, but it'd be shorter to just wait for this weekend.

 

[Ampharos King]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Hi,

I have checked on serebii.net that ononokusu and kibago have the same abilities. However, I still think they are maybe not related. I actually think each of them belong to two rivals dragon clans, hence the rivalry ability.

If both Kibago and Ononokusu have the same abilities, then there is a great chance that they are from the same evolutionary line. Ononokusu is also the same (pure) Dragon-type as Kibago and retains its trademark tusks.

 

[Eitarou]

Re: Confirmed New Pokémon Discussion

Hi,

I have checked on serebii.net that ononokusu and kibago have the same abilities. However, I still think they are maybe not related. I actually think each of them belong to two rivals dragon clans, hence the rivalry ability.

that doesnt make any sense whatsoever...the ability doesnt even work that way