- Joined
- May 9, 2022
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 185
- Pronouns
- It/Its
Okay, I've gotta be honest the webinar framing is delightfully cute, I'd love for them to do more reveals like that in future
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's Diglett. I mean, that's not a RF, that's just a pink Diglett. I honestly don't understand the choice to create "new" pokémon that are basically recolors of old pokémon. Don't we have too many pokémon already?
P.s. Am I wrong or Applin shouldn't be in the game according to the leakers?
I don't see why people are calling the new Diglett lazy recolor. Look at Paldean Wooper. It literally is just Wooper that is a Poison/Ground Type instead of Water/Ground, is brown instead of blue, and has different shaped whiskers.
Paldean Wooper is supposed to be a Wooper, this is why they look so similar. Wiglett is an extremely lazy new pokémon that occupies a spot in the national dex. This means that one day some pokemon will be left out from the regional dex of a game because Wiglett needs to be in.I don't see why people are calling the new Diglett lazy recolor. Look at Paldean Wooper. It literally is just Wooper that is a Poison/Ground Type instead of Water/Ground, is brown instead of blue, and has different shaped whiskers.
It cant be Paldean Diglett... because it's an Eel.
No amount of adapting to your environment is going to turn a mole into an Eel.
Same with tentacruel no amount of adaptation will turn a jellyfish into a mushroom.
The thing with regional variants is that they need a good reasoning for why the pokemon adapted and changed into the new thing.
And that's the only reason why we even have over 100 new Pokemon in the first place. They're basically recoloring old Pokemon and branding them as new Pokemon.Yeah, this thing is horrible. This is probably one of the laziest designs I've ever seen.
I mean... it's obviously directly inspired by Garden eel's so if it was designed to be a regional variant this idea would probably never come upTo be fair, it could have been a Paldean Diglett if they hadn't classified it as an eel.
Purely based on design there isn't anything stopping it from being a regional variant.
I'm just saying it could have easily been a regional variant solely based on the design.
Found a list on twitter of featuring every Regional Form, Pokémon getting evolutions (wether regional or regular), Ancient Species and Convergent Species leaked so far for
I mean... it's obviously directly inspired by Garden eel's so if it was designed to be a regional variant this idea would probably never come up
View attachment 164023
Edit: I for one think this was a smart concept, a pokemon based on an animal that is known for living in groups and popping in and out of the ground but not fully leaving that looks like another pokemon that is known for living in groups and popping in and out of the ground but not fully leaving.
As for the simplicity of the mon I mean... look at the animal it's based on not much to work with.
I will say to this what I always do, game freak aren't on some minimum or maximum quota of new pokemon designs, a convergent pokemon existing doesnt make another pokemon not exist.Also I feel a little suspicious about these designs in general being "new" Pokemon. I wouldn't like to see future generations with half of the dex being made up of convergent mons. If they're more like a bonus (like echo fighters in Smash Bros) then I don't mind but it just makes me nervous about future generations right now.
I agree. Mimikyu is an incredible way to mimic a design. It has an enitre story, even sad story, around it that justifies its appearence. It's not just a light brown Pikachu.Personally, I like the idea of convergent Pokemon, in theory at least.
I wish Wiglett had more differences though, like if it's "nose" was actually a mouth with one tooth like in that Diglett meme. For me the design doesn't go far enough, I wish it was a bit closer to Mimikyu territory design wise. I also feel like the name Wiglett makes it seem like they're saying it's both a new pokemon and not a new Pokemon at the same time, I wish they had chosen a name that set it apart from Diglett more.
Somebody posted this meme on Reddit and I actually wish something like this would happen to differentiate it from Diglett a bit more: r/pokemon - Not a Digglet
It's like with the hummingbird moth at first glance you think "oh that's a hummingbird" then you look closer you see that it's actually a moth. I don't get the same impression with Wiglett, it looks like Diglett and when I look closer....it still looks like it could be Diglett.
Also I feel a little suspicious about these designs in general being "new" Pokemon. I wouldn't like to see future generations with half of the dex being made up of convergent mons.
Looks more like a worm to me than an eel.I mean... it's obviously directly inspired by Garden eel's so if it was designed to be a regional variant this idea would probably never come up
View attachment 164023
Edit: I for one think this was a smart concept, a pokemon based on an animal that is known for living in groups and popping in and out of the ground but not fully leaving that looks like another pokemon that is known for living in groups and popping in and out of the ground but not fully leaving.
As for the simplicity of the mon I mean... look at the animal it's based on not much to work with.