blitzle stan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Messages
- 1,389
- Reaction score
- 3,847
Oh yeah, please know that “RFake” is absolutely just a term Khu made up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This sounds plausible, but if I know GF, its more likely that the alternate Jigglypuff and Amoonguss are labelled "ancestors" in Scarlet, and those same Pokemon are labelled "descendants" in Violet.I read a really convincing theory and I haven’t seen it mentioned so I’m gonna pass it along. The ancient and “rfake” forms might be version exclusive. The ancient forms come from the past in Scarlet and the rfakes are actually descendants from the future in Violet. So they’re two sides of the same concept essentially. It would make trading super necessary to complete the dex but that’s not something GF wouldn’t do lmao
It's kind of weird you forgot cause Digimon has had better games in the last 7 games than Pokémon has. It's funny how it always used to be the better anime but now the games are also getting there. Unfortunately Digimon will never get as big as Pokémon and I'm on a Pokémon forum so Pokémon fans will just scream at me for it.
Not to mention the one that's currently being delayed due to changes in engine is one everyone is looking forward cause of the amazing premise they showed off.
This sounds plausible, but if I know GF, its more likely that the alternate Jigglypuff and Amoonguss are labelled "ancestors" in Scarlet, and those same Pokemon are labelled "descendants" in Violet.
That way, they don't have to come up with two completely different sets of "altered Pokemon", they can just reuse the same ones for each game with different contexts and Pokedex entries (e.g. Vampire Jiggly is a caveman Jigglypuff in Scarlet, and is a post-apocalyptic Jigglypuff in Violet).
I hope I'm wrong though, it'd make a lot more sense if the "past" game has proper "past Pokemon" and the "future" game has proper "future Pokemon", rather than just two different labels for the same designs.
Per Kaka, Wooper and Tauros are the only regional variants in SV. Which is surprising, until you think about:
1. There are “normal” cross-gen evos again, for the first time since Sinnoh/Hisui
2. There are a different kind of variant in these games, the ancient forms or whatever
So it seems that, unlike gens 7 and 8 where regional variants were the only concept, there’s a lot going on in Gen 9 so therefore only two “classic style” regional variants.
Smoliv a full olive tree and a black Tauros? who would have imagined..A few tidbits from Kaka:
Fuecoco’s evo is quadrupedal.
Smoliv’s evo (not sure how many it has) is a full olive tree.
There’s a black Tauros in the game.
Pawmi’s evo is Electric/Fighting.
Sort of story spoilers:
Sada appears only in Scarlet.
There’s no 3rd legendary.
Lileep, while being plant-type, isn't based off a plant. But a sea-lily. Those are animals. A 'future-form' with flowers wouldn't make sense.Omggg I never noticed how insanely similar to Lileep that looked.
I’m pretty sure that’s a time-warp version of Lileep!!! The leakers have only said there were no fossils. A time-warp or “true” version of the fossils would NOT be fossils-they would be regular Pokémon you catch.
No worries, plenty of room in DLC, too.A couple of leaks that Centro pokemon is reporting:
- There's no 3rd legendary (weeeird. It would be the first time since G/S. I hope it's not just DLC material).
- Around 120-140 new pokemon (that includes past/future pokemon and regional fakes).
- Ancient/Future pokemon cannot evolve (What's the point of creating a new pokemon that is basically Jygglipuff that cannot even evolve? -.- )
- Tauros and Wooper are the ONLY regional forms.
- All gym leaders have a secondary job.
If they got rid of regional forms just to give has gen 1 clones and ancestors I swear I'll burn a Charizard.
I hope they are actually usable in battles. Because I never used a Jygglypuff and I don't intend to use one if the only difference is vampire teeth. I'm beginning to understand why Khu said this idea was boring. We have almost 1000 pokemon and they thought it was a good idea to create clones of already existing pokemon and call them new pokemon? I feel like a lot of new designs could have taken the spots of these gen 1 clones.No worries, plenty of room in DLC, too.
Anyway, I hope those convergent forms aren't 100% recoloured versions. I hope they have one or more unique design cues, at least.
I... I would like to see that, actually. ...Just not one of mine.I swear I'll burn a Charizard.
I think it’s matter of perspective, speaking as someone that loves both franchises. I wouldn’t say on being recently better then the other means, personally, that much, because I think both, while having decent to good games, have quite the number of flaws. The preference of one over the other depends quite a bit on the person, and how they react to those flaws. Neither franchises had, in my opinion, what would be considered great games in recent memory.It's kind of weird you forgot cause Digimon has had better games in the last 7 games than Pokémon has. It's funny how it always used to be the better anime but now the games are also getting there. Unfortunately Digimon will never get as big as Pokémon and I'm on a Pokémon forum so Pokémon fans will just scream at me for it.
Not to mention the one that's currently being delayed due to changes in engine is one everyone is looking forward cause of the amazing premise they showed off.
Bit upset Sada (And I guess mister Crypto too) seemingly are completely exclusive to the games. I had at least hope for them to feature in the other story, just not as professor.
- Ancient/Future pokemon cannot evolve (What's the point of creating a new pokemon that is basically Jygglipuff that cannot even evolve? -.- )
- Tauros and Wooper are the ONLY regional forms.
My opinion on this new ‘feature’ is going to depend a lot on how many really new Pokémon we’re going to get. Ifwe’ll get at least 90 (bare minimum), of new ones, then it’s fine.I hope they are actually usable in battles. Because I never used a Jygglypuff and I don't intend to use one if the only difference is vampire teeth. I'm beginning to understand why Khu said this idea was boring. We have almost 1000 pokemon and they thought it was a good idea to create clones of already existing pokemon and call them new pokemon? I feel like a lot of new designs could have taken the spots of these gen 1 clones.
Especially considering that they are gonna sacrifice regional variants to have them be included.I hope they are actually usable in battles. Because I never used a Jygglypuff and I don't intend to use one if the only difference is vampire teeth. I'm beginning to understand why Khu said this idea was boring. We have almost 1000 pokemon and they thought it was a good idea to create clones of already existing pokemon and call them new pokemon? I feel like a lot of new designs could have taken the spots of these gen 1 clones.
Yes, but these are not forms, they have their own number in the pokedex. We could have had 120-140 real new pokemon and they decided to create 20 forms and 10 clones and call them new pokemon. Still don't understand why, considering the total number of pokemon is actually pretty big at the moment and I feel there's no need to add 30 to those who could have easly been considered forms.My opinion on this new ‘feature’ is going to depend a lot on how many really new Pokémon we’re going to get. Ifwe’ll get at least 90 (bare minimum), of new ones, then it’s fine.
They could’ve definitely called them forms and not inflate the Pokédex, but I don’t think that they’d have added more truly new Pokémon in place of those ones, but we’ll new know.Yes, but these are not forms, they have their own number in the pokedex. We could have had 120-140 real new pokemon and they decided to create 20 forms and 10 clones and call them new pokemon. Still don't understand why, considering the total number of pokemon is actually pretty big at the moment and I feel there's no need to add 30 to those who could have easly been considered forms.
Trainer customization: I sleepWe have to understand that at this point, creating 'recolors' of existing pokemon is the safest, lowest stake thing GF can do. Not only new designs are hit and miss with the audience and the number of pokemon is staggering at this point but new models are difficult to make/animate and new pokemon as battling partners are difficult to rebalance in terms of both story and competitive gameplay. These are, yeah, essentially 'outfits' for existing models made interesting. (Hopefully...) Of course I'd prefer a game with tons of new pokemon every time but it's not realistic to expect that.